New York Consumer Rights & Foreclosure Defense Representation by Application / (718) 957-8140 Call Now
Attorney Advertising
Case Study · Foreclosure Defense · Appellate Division

The 90-day noticewas defective.Case dismissed.

$32,287Attorney fees The trust lost on appeal.

Facing foreclosure? Petroff Amshen LLP is a New York consumer rights and foreclosure defense law firm. We find the defense in your file and take it to court.

Free case review. Confidential. Representation is by application.

The Result
Fees awarded
$32,287
In attorney fees awarded to our clients against U.S. Bank Trust National Association.
2018 ruling against our clients
Wiped out
We got it undone in 2022.
The trust's appeal
Failed
The trust's excuse: "conclusory and unsubstantiated."
Appellate Division, Second Department · James Tierney and Steven Amshen, Petroff Amshen LLP · 2026
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case turns on its own facts.
The Case

The trust won in 2018.
It did not last.

Quick AnswerOn July 1, 2026, the Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed, with costs, an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County that refused to revive a foreclosure dismissed against Petroff Amshen's clients. Bank of America started the case in November 2013, and Elizon Master Participation Trust I, the trust that took over the loan, continued it. In 2022 the court found the 90-day notice "contains impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures," vacated a 2018 summary judgment and, in February 2023, dismissed the complaint. The trust blamed law office failure for not opposing, and the Appellate Division called that excuse "conclusory and unsubstantiated." In a separate Nassau County action, our clients were awarded $32,287.50 in attorney fees under Real Property Law 282.

A case the trust thought it had won

Bank of America, N.A. started this foreclosure in November 2013 against our clients over their property in Nassau County. Our firm has been on the file since 2014.

In an order entered November 15, 2018, the court granted summary judgment against our clients, struck their answer and appointed a referee. The same order substituted the trust as the plaintiff. The trust then moved for a judgment of foreclosure and sale, which is usually the last step before a house goes to auction.

The notice that sank the case

Before a lender can sue to foreclose on a home loan in New York, RPAPL 1304 requires it to send the borrower a 90-day pre-foreclosure notice, and it has to get that notice right. While the trust's motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale was pending, our clients asked the court to take another look at the 2018 summary judgment. The trust did not oppose.

The 90-Day Notice contains impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures.Supreme Court, Nassau County, order entered November 16, 2022

That made the notice defective, and the trust could not show it had met a condition it had to satisfy before foreclosing. The court denied the motion for a judgment of foreclosure and sale and vacated the 2018 summary judgment.

In December 2022 our clients moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. The trust did not oppose that motion either. On February 15, 2023, the court granted it and dismissed the complaint.

The trust's attempt to undo it

In February 2023 the trust asked the court to vacate both orders. A party that lets a motion go unanswered can sometimes get a second chance, but it has to show two things: a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious opposition. The trust blamed law office failure. The court denied the request on July 13, 2023.

The Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed on July 1, 2026, with costs. Law office failure can excuse a missed response only when it comes with "a detailed and credible explanation of the default." The trust's excuse, the court held, was "conclusory and unsubstantiated." Without a reasonable excuse, the court did not need to go any further. All four justices agreed.

Attorney fees for our clients

When a mortgage lets the lender charge the borrower its legal fees, New York law lets a borrower who successfully defends a foreclosure recover attorney fees too. In a separate Nassau County action, the court found that our fees related to the successful defense of the foreclosure and, in November 2025, awarded our clients $32,287.50.

The result

  • The 2018 summary judgment against our clients vacated.
  • The foreclosure complaint against our clients dismissed.
  • The trust's attempt to undo the dismissal rejected, affirmed on appeal with costs.
  • $32,287.50 in attorney fees awarded to our clients.
The very first step was wrong. The case could not stand.
Timeline

From a win for the trust
to a loss on appeal.

The law requires
A proper 90-day notice before suing.
The trust needed
Proof it had met that condition.
The court found
It could not. Case dismissed.

The notice was dated June 10, 2013. The court vacated the 2018 ruling in 2022 and dismissed the complaint in February 2023.

  1. Nov 2013
    Bank of America sues our clients.
  2. Nov 2018
    Summary judgment against our clients. A referee is appointed.
  3. Nov 2022
    The notice is found defective. The 2018 ruling is vacated.
  4. Feb 2023
    The complaint is dismissed.
  5. Nov 2025
    $32,287.50 in fees awarded to our clients.
  6. Jul 2026
    The trust loses its appeal.
The Legal Record · 90-Day Notice

The notice came first.
That was the defense.

The record, in order: what the law requires, what the notice contained, and what the courts held.

What the law requires · RPAPL 1304
90 days
Before suing on a home loan, a lender must send the borrower a 90-day notice. New York requires strict compliance.
What this notice contained · June 2013
Defective
In the court's words, it contained "impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures."
The argumentThe trust saidThe Court held
01
The notice has to be right.RPAPL 1304 · 90-day notice
The trust saidNothing. It did not oppose our clients' motions.
The Court heldDefective
The notice "contains impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures." The 2018 ruling was vacated and the complaint dismissed.
02
A missed response needs a real excuse.CPLR 5015(a)(1) · vacating a default
The trust saidIts law office failed to respond, so both orders should be vacated.
The Court heldRejected
The excuse was "conclusory and unsubstantiated," without "a detailed and credible explanation." Affirmed, with costs.
The 2018 ruling for the trust, undone.Its appeal changed nothing.
Facing a foreclosure like this one?
A licensed New York attorney reviews every application. Free and confidential.
Apply for Your Case Review
Legal Analysis · Plain English

What the Court decided,
and why it matters.

1. The 90-day notice has to be right

RPAPL 1304 requires a lender to send a 90-day notice before suing to foreclose on a home loan, and New York requires strict compliance. Here the court found the notice contained "impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures." A defective notice meant the trust could not prove a condition it had to meet before foreclosing.

2. A ruling against you is not always the end

Summary judgment was granted against our clients in 2018, and the trust was moving toward a sale. In 2022 our clients asked the court to take another look, and the court vacated the 2018 ruling once it found the notice defective.

3. A missed response needs a real excuse

A party that does not oppose a motion can ask the court to vacate the order, but it must show a reasonable excuse and a potentially meritorious opposition. Law office failure counts only with "a detailed and credible explanation of the default." The trust's excuse was "conclusory and unsubstantiated," so the Appellate Division did not need to look further.

4. Fees run both ways

Real Property Law 282 lets a borrower who successfully defends a foreclosure recover attorney fees when the mortgage lets the lender recover its own. A Nassau County court found our fees related to the successful defense of the foreclosure and awarded our clients $32,287.50.

What this means if you are facing foreclosure

A summary judgment for the bank is serious, but it is not always the end. Here it was undone years later because the very first step, the 90-day notice, was wrong.

If you received a 90-day notice before your foreclosure started, keep it and show it to a lawyer. What it says can matter, and so can what it should not say. And if your mortgage lets the bank charge you its legal fees, you may be able to recover yours when you win.

Attorneys on the Case

The attorneys
behind the win.

James Tierney and Steven Amshen of Petroff Amshen LLP represented our clients in the Appellate Division, Second Department.

James Tierney, Petroff Amshen LLP
Appellate counsel
Profile
Steven Amshen, Petroff Amshen LLP
Appellate counsel
Profile
Questions

Questions people search
about foreclosure in New York.

What is the 90-day notice in a New York foreclosure?
Before a lender can sue to foreclose on a home loan in New York, RPAPL 1304 requires it to send the borrower a 90-day pre-foreclosure notice. Courts require strict compliance with that rule.
Can a defective 90-day notice get a foreclosure dismissed?
It did here. The court found the notice "contains impermissible debt collection and bankruptcy disclosures," so the trust could not show it met a condition it had to meet before foreclosing, and the complaint against our clients was dismissed. Every case turns on its own facts.
The bank already won summary judgment. Can that be undone?
Sometimes. Here summary judgment was granted in 2018. In 2022 our clients asked the court to take another look, and the court vacated the 2018 ruling after finding the 90-day notice defective.
What happens if a bank does not respond to a motion in a foreclosure?
The court can decide the motion without its side. To undo an order entered on its default, the bank must show both a reasonable excuse and a potentially meritorious opposition. Here the trust did not oppose two motions and could not show a reasonable excuse.
Is law office failure an excuse for missing a deadline?
Only when it comes with "a detailed and credible explanation of the default." The Appellate Division found the trust's excuse "conclusory and unsubstantiated."
Can a borrower recover attorney fees after a foreclosure is dismissed?
Yes, in some cases. New York Real Property Law 282 lets a borrower recover attorney fees for successfully defending a foreclosure when the mortgage lets the lender recover its own. Here a Nassau County court awarded our clients $32,287.50.
How long did this case take?
Bank of America filed in November 2013. The complaint was dismissed in February 2023, and the Appellate Division affirmed on July 1, 2026.
Does Petroff Amshen represent clients outside New York?
No. Petroff Amshen represents clients in New York only.
Glossary: the terms in plain English
90-day notice
The notice New York requires a lender to send before suing to foreclose on a home loan, under RPAPL 1304.
Summary judgment
A ruling on the papers, without a trial. Here it was first granted against our clients, then vacated.
Referee
A person the court appoints in a foreclosure to compute what is owed, a step toward a sale.
Judgment of foreclosure and sale
The order that lets the property be sold. The court denied the trust's motion for one.
Default
Failing to respond to a motion on time. The trust defaulted on two motions.
Law office failure
A mistake by a party's own lawyers, offered as an excuse for a default. It needs a detailed and credible explanation.
RPL 282
New York Real Property Law 282. It can let a borrower who wins a foreclosure recover attorney fees.
Affirmed
The appeals court agreed with the lower court's order and left it in place.
Petroff Amshen Reviews

What clients
have said.

★★★★★

I could not recommend a better group than Petroff Amshen. If you find yourself in a situation that requires the assistance of attorneys, this is the firm.

Eli Miller / Google
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
★★★★★

After years of battling in court, thousands of dollars in legal fees, and quite a few subpar attorneys, we found Petroff and Amshen, who delivered winning results. They're incredibly easy to talk to, making the whole legal process feel less intimidating.

Charlene J. / Google
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
★★★★★

An effective firm with a minimum of fuss. When you need attorneys who actually do the work, you need these guys on your side.

Joseph Petruzzo / Google
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Apply for Your Case Review

Tell the firm
what happened.

Petroff Amshen does not take every case. Submit the application and a licensed New York attorney will review the matter directly. The case review is free and confidential.

  • 01Submissions are confidential.
  • 02Reviewed by a licensed New York attorney, not a call center.
  • 03Most applications are reviewed within one business day.
  • 04If the matter fits the practice, the firm reaches out to schedule a consultation. If not, the firm says so.
  • 05Fee structure is discussed at the consultation.
James Tierney, Petroff Amshen LLP
Appellate counsel on this case
Steven Amshen, Petroff Amshen LLP
Appellate counsel on this case
If you would rather call
(718) 957-8140
Application for Case Review

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Petroff Amshen LLP does not sell, share, or disclose this information to any third party. All submissions are confidential and reviewed by a licensed New York attorney.